An Integrative Review of the Application of Orem’s Self-care Nursing Theory on Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients Self-care: An Integrative Review
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Review
E-PUB
6 November 2025

An Integrative Review of the Application of Orem’s Self-care Nursing Theory on Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients Self-care: An Integrative Review

Mediterr Nurs Midwifery. Published online 6 November 2025.
1. Department of Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing Near East University Faculty of Nursing, Nicosia, TRNC Mersin 10, Turkey
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 08.07.2024
Accepted Date: 18.12.2024
E-Pub Date: 06.11.2025
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Diabetes incidence is rapidly increasing, and it is projected that by 2045, there will be at least 783 million individuals worldwide if nothing is done. In nursing practice, Orem’s self-care theory is known to be effective in managing chronic diseases such as type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The purpose of this review is to examine studies on the use of Orem’s self-care theory in the self-care of T2DM patients. The literature was searched from digital libraries and databases (Science Direct, EBSCO, Scopus, Springer, Wiley Online, SciELO, and Web of Science) between March and June 2023. Publications available in full text in English were used, the strength of evidence was graded in the first screening (source, level, and quality), and 13 publications were included in this review. The analyzed studies were from 8 countries, 4 (31%) of which were from Iran; most of the studies were experimental research (62%), and only one article (8%) used a case study approach. The review provides insights into the effectiveness of applying the theory but also suggests directions for further research, including addressing psychological aspects, adopting different methodologies, and using the theory in various cultural and regional contexts. This review highlights the evolving nature of the theory, which holds significant innovative potential in managing chronic diseases and offers hope and possibility for the future.

Keywords:
Orem’s theory, integrative review, type II diabetes mellitus, chronic disease, self-care

Introduction

Diabetes is a form and group of metabolic diseases characterized by hyperglycemia (1) the condition is caused by either a shortage of insulin or the body’s ineffective use of insulin (2). The International Diabetes Federation estimates that diabetes-related health spending globally increased from USD 850 billion in 2017 to USD 966 billion in 2021; it will reach USD 1.03 to 1.05 trillion between 2030 and 2045. Currently, diabetes affects more than one in 10 adults (20-79 years), and the list of countries with at least one in five adults affected by diabetes is increasing; the estimated prevalence of diabetes has risen from 450 million in 2017 to 537 million in 2021 if nothing is done to address the problem the figure will rise to 643 million by 2030 and further increase to an alarming 783 million by 2045; therefore, immediate action is needed to prevent the staggering rise in the statistics (3).

The disease affects individuals in every region, including the rural areas of low- and middle-income nations (1) in 2019, the prevalence of diabetes among adults in European Union (EU) countries was 6.2%, it increased to 9.2% in 2021 (4). The prevalence varied across EU member countries; in Cyprus, the rate of diabetes rose from 81.8 to 87.5, and the projections suggest that by 2045, the prevalence rate will reach 115.8 (5). A study conducted among elderly groups in Northern Cyprus found that more than half of the participants had diabetes (6). If diabetes is not effectively managed, there is a high chance of developing complications such as renal, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (7-11). About thirty to forty percent (30 to 40%) of individuals living with diabetes develop chronic kidney disease (CKD), and diabetes is the leading cause of CKD (12). Diabetes is a significant cause of death globally, though the death rate varies according to the region; it is estimated that over six million (6.7 million) individuals die as a result of diabetes or its complications (3). Diabetes-related mortality is rising in both developed and developing nations (13). Nevertheless, mortality was higher in middle-income countries than in high-income countries (14).

Despite the advantages of diabetic self-care, the incidence of type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is still out of control because patients do not have the information or support they need to follow the advised lifestyle adjustments (15). Self-care has gained significant attention in healthcare systems worldwide (16, 17). Self-care was clearly defined in the late 20th century (18) and facilitated by the change in disease trends from acute to chronic conditions (19). With the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, individuals must take more responsibility for their care (20). Some researchers suggest that people with chronic diseases can be effectively managed through self-care, mainly when nurses practice ethically (21). For individuals with chronic diseases, self-care becomes a primary form of care as they make daily self-management and treatment administration decisions (22). Competent self-management will represent self-care when patients are informed and given guidance (23, 24).

Diabetes self-management is part of self-care; it is an informed, learned, objective, and practical activity and behaviour carried out in actual life situations daily (25). It involves taking responsibility for monitoring blood glucose levels, dietary adjustments, lifestyle changes, and adhering to medications (26, 27). These self-care practices are crucial for diabetes management (28, 29). Self-care is essential for efficiently managing diabetes, maintaining glycaemic control, maintaining a balanced and healthy life, better management of coexisting conditions, and long-term benefits, thus reducing the chance of diabetes complications occurring and improving the overall quality of life (QOL) (30, 31). Some studies reported that educating individuals with diabetes on self-care helps in successfully managing individuals with T2DM (32, 33), ultimately leading to better glycemic control (34). Higher education levels among diabetic patients were found to be a significant predictor of better self-care scores in a related study of self-care and T2DM management by Bukhsh et al. (35). Tharek et al. (36) revealed a relationship between greater self-efficacy, boosted self-care behavior, and improved glycemic control among respondents in Malaysia. 

Orem’s theory influenced nursing practice, particularly in the aspect of self-care (37). The “nest” of theories Orem found consisted of three theories: self-care, the lack of self-care and the nursing system (38, 39) later, the theory of dependent care was developed and added to address the complexity of the patients and caregivers (40). Orem believes that people can care for themselves; nurses must assist patients if this is not achieved (41, 42). The main assumptions of self-care nursing theory (SCNT) align with the guidelines for treating diabetic patients set forth by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) (9). Understanding Orem’s theory requires grasping six key concepts: self-care, therapeutic self-care demand, self-care deficiency, self-care agency, nursing agency, and nursing system (43). SCNT clarifies how and why people practice self-care (44) and why nurses assist people through nursing (45). Orem contends that a patient’s constraint on treatment determines the nursing system. Because of this, nurses provide various nursing care within the system including educational and supporting care and partial and complete care (46). The SCNT helps nurses manage patients more effectively by promoting and implementing self-care; (47) it is one of the theories that inspired nursing practice globally, especially in managing chronic diseases, of which T2DM is one. The purpose of this review is to examine studies on the use of Orem’s self-care theory in the self-care of T2DM patients. The research question guiding the review includes the following:

I. What methodological approaches have researchers adopted in applying SCNT for T2DM self-care?

II. What are the characteristics of the studies that utilized SCNT for T2DM self-care?

III. What aspects of T2DM self-care and outcome measures are the published articles using SCNT focused?

Material and Method

Design

The design for this review is an integrative review in which the process permits the inclusion of numerous study types for a detailed understanding of the topic (48). In this review, the focus is on using SCNT for T2DM; the following review steps were used: spotting the related review theme, searching the databases, creating exclusion and inclusion criteria, recognizing and retrieving designated and selected studies, categorizing the chosen studies, analyzing and interpreting data, and presenting the synthesized result of the review (48). During the review process, the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis method was used (49). The integrative review’s flowchart is shown in Figure 1.

Data Source

The search method utilized a variety of sources, including a digital library, the PubMed portal containing MEDLINE, and seven electronic databases (Science Direct, EBSCO, Scopus, Springer, Wiley Online, SciELO and Web of Science). During the search process, the following keywords were used: “self-care”, “Orem’s theory”, “diabetes type II”, “type II diabetes”, and “nursing” in the English version. The search was performed in March and June 2023 and updated in March 2024. The studies were spotted and chosen based on the aim of the review and the criteria set by the researchers. The strategy adopted for the search of the articles ensures the selection of the articles evaluated by the researcher through the combination and analysis of the relevant keyword titles and abstracts. The selected article was then reviewed following the review guide (48).

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The below inclusion and exclusion criteria were used for the selection of the reviewed articles:

Inclusion criteria: Studies on T2DM that used SCNT, articles covering the review aim and questions, articles published in English between March 2004 and March 2024, and lastly, full-text articles.

Exclusion criteria: Studies on T2DM that did not use SCNT, articles published in other languages apart from English, articles with restricted access or without access to the full text that can clarify the review aim and criteria.

Data Selection and Extraction

The two reviewers (researchers) maintained independence throughout the review process; reference management software (Endnote 21TM) was used to organizes and remove duplicate studies from searched databases. Further checks and removal were independently conducted manually by the researchers. In addition, the researchers independently assessed the two stages of the review, from study selection process to data synthesis and analysis stage; disagreements were discussed, and consensus was reached. The selection process was done in two stages; the first considered titles and abstracts of all retrieved articles, while in the second stage, the full text of the potential eligible articles was retrieved and assessed based on the eligibility criteria; the two stages of selection were conducted by the two researchers independently ensuring adequate considerations to potential studies, discrepancies were discussed, and agreement reached. The researchers independently extracted data from the included articles using the reviewers’ standardized data extraction form to minimize bias and ensure accuracy. The extracted data included the author, year, country, purpose of the study, methodological approach, quality score/level, sample, application of the theory, and findings.

Ethical Consideration

The authors have carefully followed ethical standards, ensuring that any potential problems, including data falsification, double submission or publication, misconduct, plagiarism, bias, and redundancy, have been addressed and avoided in the review.

Sample Data Collection Tools and Quality Appraisal

The total sample used in the conduct of the review comprises 13 articles. For this review, the researchers used an integrative review tool that consists of the following guide; spotting of the article, characteristics/attributes of the research methods, evaluation/appraisal of the methodological rigor, intervention/treatment used, a case study approach and the results. The tool enables the identification of a common research language and terms among healthcare professionals and related areas that conduct research related to the review (48). The initial screening and rating of the strength of evidence (source, level, and quality) for the articles included in the review was done using the Stetler tool (50), and the researchers ensured that the articles included were within the accepted level of evidence and quality (levels I to IV) as shown in Table 1.

Results

Characteristics of the Reviewed Studies

A total of 13 publications were selected as samples for critical analysis. The 13 articles examined came from various journals, all relevant to the nursing field. All of the studies (100%) had authors who were nurses (51-63); however, four of them (31%) also had additional professionals, primarily doctors of internal medicine and endocrinology. The studies analyzed were done in 8 countries as shown in Table 1, of which 4 (31%) were in Iran, 2 (15%) in the United States, and 2 (15%) in Brazil. The remaining nations each had one publication. About the year of publication, there was only one in 2007 (8%), followed by three more in 2011, 2013, and 2015. 2018 accounted for 2 (16%) publications, while 2017 had the largest number with 4 (31%) publications. The bulk 8 (62%) of the methodological approaches as seen in Table 1, were experimental design (52-58), whereas 4 (31%) combined non-experimental techniques that emphasized correlating/description (60, 61), prediction (62), and exploration (63). A case study was only employed as the research’s design in 1 (8%) published paper. The case study focused on guiding patients through diabetic self-care using systematic and standardized nursing language (51). Table 1 showed more than half (62%) of the studies were interventional (52-59), addressing T2DM self-care, on the interventional studies, more than half (57%) used intervention/control groups (53, 55, 56, 58, 59), while less than half (43%) used 1 group with data collection prior and post-intervention (52, 54, 57). The duration for the interventional studies ranges between a minimum of twelve weeks (55), and the maximum 8 months (56), regarding the number of sessions, the minimum was one session (55), and the highest was four sessions (52). The period spent in session during interventional studies ranges from 25-30 minutes (53), to the highest of three hours (Table 1) (56).

Aspects of T2DM Self-care and Outcome Measures Reviewed Articles Using SCNT Focused; SCNT and Self-care Competency, Information Retention and T2DM Glycaemic Control

One of the interventional articles as shown in Table 2 focused on improving physical, cognitive, emotional, and motivational competence of patients with T2DM for self-care before (T1) and after (T2) being included in a multi-professional educational program showed the result of physical competence scores varied in T1 from an average of 17.80 [standard deviation (SD)=1.54 to an average of 18.10 (SD=1.43) in T2; regarding cognitive competence, the total sum of scores in T1 varied from an average of 21.35 (SD=4.28) to an average of 33.26 (SD=3.68) in T2. Regarding emotional and motivational competence, the total scores varied from an average of 34.51 (SD=4.50) to 37.98 (SD=3.80). The findings showed a significant increase after the intervention, the researchers conclude that nurses can apply the findings to similar contexts after considering the study’s limitations (52). In Table 2, the Iranian study focused on the effect of the teach-back method to teach T2DM self-care. The average score of foot self-care for the pretest was lower in the teach-back group than in the control group. However, at post-tests 1, 2, and 3 (i.e., seven days, 1, and 3 months), the score in the intervention (teach-back) group was higher significantly than the control group. The one-way analysis of variance comparison within the group showed that the self-care average score significantly differed across the four time measurement points (p<0.001) in the teach-back group. After 1 and 3 months of the treatment (intervention), the average foot self-care score in the teach-back group was more significant than the pretest readings in the same (teach-back) and control groups. The results showed the intervention (teach-back education) effectiveness in enhancing information retention; hence, the researchers recommended the technique for larger-scale studies or improving patients’ self-care abilities (53). Furthermore, a double-blind, randomized control study was carried out in Turkey as seen in Table 2, to determine the effect of diabetes education and intervention on self-care in T2DM patients. After implementing the SCNT-based self-management diabetes intervention, the researchers found a significant difference between the groups in the aspect of self-care agency (p<0.05). The pretest and post-test score analysis showed that post-intervention scores for the self-care agency and activity were higher and the value of glycaeted haemoglobin was lower than the pre-intervention average (p<0.05). The researchers conclude that self-management, self-care activity, and agency, as well as the glycaemic control of patients in the intervention group, improved; hence, SCNT was an excellent strategy in planning and implementing self-management education studies (56). Lastly implementing an educational intervention based on the SCNT as shown in Table 2 has significantly improved diabetes-related knowledge, self-care management, and reduced fasting blood glucose (FBG) among patients with T2DM. Since the patient’s evaluation of diabetes affects their self-care management, the researchers concluded that designing and implementing an Orem’s based self-care management program can improve the self-care management of patients with T2DM, thereby improving the disease outcomes (Table 2) (57).

SCNT and Improving T2DM QOL

Two of the reviewed articles in Table 3 examined the effect of self-care education on diabetes patients QOL; both of the studies were conducted in Iran, and one of the studies evaluated the effect of the self-care education on QOL in T2DM patients. The results showed differences in the three aspects of QOL but were not statistically significant. The impact of self-care education on patients’ QOL affects the overall average of QOL, but this increase was not statistically significant (54). The other study in Table 3 that implemented the Orem self-care model improved the QOL of patients in the interventional group in all aspects except general health and emotional functioning. Based on the result, the researchers conclude that nurses in clinical care can use the model to provide the necessary training to patients, thereby increasing their QOL. Teachers can also emphasize this self-care model in nursing education to nurture students toward improving the QOL of patients with diabetes (55). Another study determined the effect of a one-to-one health education intervention based on self-care theory on the self-management ability and QOL in patients with recently diagnosed T2DM. A total of one hundred and six admitted patients in the First People’s Hospital of Wenling were divided into a control and observation group (n=53 each) based on admission; the observation group received one-on-one health education according to Orem’s theory of self-care, while the control group received routine health education. The researchers compared self-management ability (SCSCA rating), self-efficacy [general self-efficacy scale (GSES) rating], FBG, QOL, 2-hour postprandial glucose (2-h PG), nursing satisfaction, and treatment compliance before and after the intervention in each group. Researchers found no significant difference in summary of diabetes self-care activities (SDSCA) or GSES scores between observation and control groups before intervention as shown in Table 3. Still, the SDSCA and GSES scores in the groups after intervention were greater than before (p<0.05), and the difference is significant. In addition, the treatment compliance rate was lower in the control group than in the observation group (p<0.05). After the intervention, in the observation group, fasting plasma glucose and 2-h PG were less than those in the control group (p<0.05), and the difference was significant. For QOL and nursing satisfaction after the intervention, the scores were significantly higher in the observation groups, and the difference was significant for both parameters (p<0.05). The researchers concluded that a one-to-one education intervention built on the self-care theory could increase self-management skills and self-efficacy in patients with recently diagnosed T2DM, improve treatment adherence, and encourage reduction of blood sugar. Achieving the mentioned goals improves patients’ QOL and increases nursing satisfaction (Table 3) (59).

SCNT, Professional Nursing Practice and Management of T2DM Foot Ulcers

Among the reviewed articles in Table 4, one used a case study as a methodological approach; findings showed the patient’s knowledge led to self-monitoring of blood glucose with food choices supporting adequate glycemic control and a total weight reduction of 7.6 pounds, surpassing her shorter-term target (51). One Iranian intervention study in Table 4 demonstrated that implementing Orem’s self-care program has a positive effect on improving the self-care behaviours of patients. The researchers found a significant difference (p<0.05) between the groups on self-care average scores, infection, ischemia, affected areas (zones), and wound healing. The model application helps manage foot ulcers, and changes patients’ lives through decreasing medical cost and the risk of amputation. The researchers suggest conducting large-scale studies in other regions with different educational and cultural systems so that the impact of the model’s application can be studied broadly and used effectively for diabetic foot ulcer. The study results can benefit nursing management, diabetes associations, diabetic patients and their families. Using a qualitative approach (interviews and focused group discussions) as seen in Table 4, twelve elderly patients with T2DM were evaluated to indicate nursing diagnoses and conditioning factors of self-care in the light of Orem’s theory of self-care. After validating the nursing diagnoses, collected data were analyzed using thematic analysis with the help of MAXQD software, version 20.0.8. The results of the identified twenty nursing diagnoses were supported by SCNT, with the nurse’s role as a guide and support for the practice of self-care, especially for aged people with T2DM. The major categories of the identified diagnosis were related to a lack of therapeutic adherence (self-neglect; ineffective health maintenance). Sedentary lifestyle (joint stiffness, pain, lack of family support): risk of unstable sugar, and impaired urinary elimination, among others. The theoretical support to systematize nursing care allows comprehensive and individualized care for the elderly with T2DM. This strategic application of SCNT is a guide for implementing nursing interventions to promote self-care for T2DM (Table 4) (63).

SCNT as the Framework for Studying and Predicting T2DM Self-care Behaviours

One of the studies in Table 5 determined the relationship between exercise/physical activity and obesity in adults with T2DM using a descriptive correlational design. One hundred twenty-four patients were selected using a random sample from seventeen community centers. Findings showed the average number of steps in a day indicated a reversed relationship between the body mass index (-0.282, p<0.01) and waist circumference (-0.300, p<0.01). Exercise and knowledge of diabetes were positively correlated (r=0.179, p=0.04). Women (p<0.05) had a higher body fat percentage than men. The researchers concluded that findings significantly impact professional nursing practice and are essential in fostering self-care behaviours such as physical activity (60). In Table 5, a study described the respondents’ knowledge and self-care management practices; findings indicated moderate-to-high knowledge of glucose monitoring, foot care, and drug compliance (61). Another study in Table 5 focused on health-promoting and self-care behaviours that needs visits to a health care practitioner or provider using the key variables. Regression analysis showed that the R2 for the socio-economic and socio-cultural variables accounted for 4.2% of the variance. Age at diagnosis and income level showed a significant negative relationship. The scores of the older women were lower and they reported fewer health-promoting self-care behaviours, necessitating more healthcare provider visits than younger women. Subjects with lower income levels practiced little self-care, hence employment status was positively associated with the behaviours; employed subjects had higher ratings and were likelier to practice self-care behaviours that needed a healthcare practitioner visit. The study exemplifies the applicability of SCNT to African American women with T2DM using previous records (Table 5) (62).

Discussion

The review showed the resourcefulness of applying Orem’s theory to the self-care of T2DM. All the authors were nurses, and publications occurred in nursing journals from eight countries. Iran was the foremost country among the reviewed articles, scientific publication and production have grown steadily. As of 2022, the country occupies the 15th position worldwide in the Scopus database ranking, with more than 78,000 scientific articles (64), and ranked 15th and 16th in scientific publications worldwide (65). One of the studies (52), used educational programs that align with the ADA recommendations for improving competencies in diabetes self-management (66), the implementation of a teach-back method by an Iranian study enhanced self-care information retention while self-care agency, activity and glycemic control were improved among the respondents that participated in a Turkish study (56). Based on the above results, one can infer that SCNT was an excellent strategy for planning and implementing self-management education studies. One of the studies (54), reported overall average QOL of the participants in the treatment group increased, but this increase was not statistically significant; thus, the researchers thought psychological issues caused the patient’s problems and conflicts (67), and possibly because the designed educational program did not cover psychological issues, the results are close to expectations; the researchers suggest that future research should focus on the psychological distress resulting from T2DM and its impact on patient’s QOL. 

The China study found that QOL scores were higher and significant after the intervention; based on the result, nurses in clinical care can use the model to provide the necessary training to patients, thereby increasing their QOL (59). Teachers can also emphasize this self-care model in nursing education to nurture students toward improving the QOL of T2DM patients. Concerning the above findings, other researchers also reported significant findings as a result of the application of Orem’s theory in managing chronic conditions; these include decreasing fatigue in multiple sclerosis patients (68), motor balance and function in multiple sclerosis patients (69), QOL and self-efficacy in patients with hypertension (70), and the self-care ability of patients with myocardial infarction (71), all the studies were interventional and reported significant findings.

The review showed SCNT was utilized as a theoretical framework that guides study, helps predict health-promoting and self-care behaviours among respondents and provides individualized nursing interventions that enhance self-care for T2DM (51, 60, 62, 63), these results make it necessary for clinical nurse specialists to provide treatment in a variety of settings and contexts according to their knowledge and abilities in counselling and teaching (51). An increase in the number of T2DM clients will increase the need for experts in the field; in response to this demand, nurses are collaborating with clients to collect data and discuss choices and needs. Related to the above findings are pieces of literature supporting the use of SCNT for a case study on other chronic conditions like stroke and psychiatric conditions (72, 73).

Study Limitations

In terms of limitation, the researchers used only articles published on electronic data bases based on the inclusion criteria, this may limit access to other useful literatures regarding the topic. In addition, diverse methodologies, literature sources for different data bases and articles written in English may influence this integrative review results, this necessitates careful interpretation of the above findings. However, despite these limitations, researchers used well-defined criteria and quality assessments to ensure that the articles reviewed provide evidence-based findings and mitigate these limitations.

Directions for Future Research

Based on the review, only 1 article utilized the theory as a case study approach for T2DM (71); this showed a need for more literature on case studies on T2DM self-care using SCNT, hence the need to address the identified gap. Among the reviewed articles, only one utilized a qualitative approach (83): this also signifies a need for more published literature on the qualitative methodological approach, constituting a significant gap that should be filled. Among the reviewed articles, there is no study that use mixed-method research design; despite seeming significant, this also forms a research gap that should be considered. The experimental and non-experimental articles reviewed focused on SCNT and related outcomes, such as self-care behaviours and management abilities (52, 55, 56); QOL (53, 54, 58), and improving physical, emotional, cognitive, and motivational competence (51); none focused on SCNT and constructs related to mental health, such as psychological distress, which is common among T2DM patients; this also forms a critical gap in the literature. All the interventional studies that used SCNT as a teaching strategy utilized traditional or routine teaching methods despite the advantages of technology, such as social media, mobile applications and online teaching, which also need special consideration for future research related to SCNT and T2DM. Most of the studies were conducted in middle- and high-income countries; there is no single article among the reviewed papers from developing countries, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa. Hence, research is needed to describe how SCNT is applied in various regional settings and cultures.

Conclusion

The review provides several meaningful insights and directions for future research in applying SCNT to the self-care of T2DM; the theory application for self-care of T2DM patients has shown promise and effectiveness. However, there are various avenues for further research and exploration, including addressing psychological aspects, adopting diverse research methodologies, and expanding the use of the theory in different cultural and regional contexts. This review highlights the evolving nature of nursing theory (SCNT) and the potential for continued growth and innovation in managing chronic conditions like T2DM.

Acknowledgements

The authors were grateful for the support of the University Library’s IT team during the article search process.
Author Contributions: Surgical and Medical Practices - S.E., A.I.; Concept - S.E., A.I.; Design - S.E., A.I.; Data Collection or Processing - A.I.; Analysis or Interpretation - S.E., A.I.; Literature Search - S.E., A.I.; Writing - S.E., A.I.
Declaration of Interests: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Funding: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
World Health Organization. Diabetes [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023 [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/diabetes#tab=tab_1
2
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Type 2 Diabetes [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2023 [cited 2023 Feb 5]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/about/about-type-2- diabetes.html?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/basics/type2.html
3
Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, Pinkepank M, Ogurtsova K, Duncan BB, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;183109119. Erratum in: Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023;204:110945.
4
Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9 th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843.
5
Ogurtsova K, Guariguata L, Barengo NC, Ruiz PL, Sacre JW, Karuranga S, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global estimates of undiagnosed diabetes in adults for 2021. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;183:109118.
6
Esmaeilzadeh S, Oz F. Effect of psychosocial care model applied in an “elderly day care center” on loneliness, depression, quality of life, and elderly attitude. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020;23(2):189-197.
7
Asghari M, Naghibi A, Rostami F. An investigation of the effect of training on self-care promotion in type 2 diabetic patients in Noor Health Center in 2015. Journal of Health Research in Community. 2015;1(2):22-28.
8
Avogaro A, Fadini GP. Microvascular complications in diabetes: a growing concern for cardiologists. Int J Cardiol. 2019;291:29-35.
9
American Diabetes Association. Statistics About Diabetes [Internet]. Arlington (VA): American Diabetes Association; 2023. Available from: https://diabetes.org/about-diabetes/statistics/about-diabetes
10
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Diabetes and chronic kidney disease [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2024. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/diabetes-complications/diabetes-and-chronic-kidney-disease.html
11
Mayeda L, Katz R, Ahmad I, Bansal N, Batacchi Z, Hirsch IB, et al. Glucose time in range and peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020;8(1):e000991.
12
International Diabetes Federation (IDF). Diabetes and kidney disease [Internet]. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2024. Available from: https://diabetesatlas.org/resources/idf-diabetes-atlas-reports/diabetes-and-kidney-disease/
13
Feyzi R, Madmoli M. Epidemiologic approach to quality of life in diabetic patients: a systematic review study. IJMBS. 2019;3:24-28.
14
Khaltaev N, Axelrod S. Global trends in diabetes-related mortality with regard to lifestyle modifications, risk factors, and affordable management: a preliminary analysis. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2021;7(3):182-189.
15
Zowgar AM, Siddiqui MI, Alattas KM. Level of diabetes knowledge among adult patients with diabetes using diabetes knowledge test. Saudi Med J. 2018;39(2):161-168.
16
Jaarsma T, Strömberg A, Ben Gal T, Cameron J, Driscoll A, Duengen HD, et al. Comparison of self-care behaviors of heart failure patients in 15 countries worldwide. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;92(1):114-120.
17
Liu Y, Wu X, Cai C, Tang PY, Coufal MM, Qian Y, et al. Peer support in Shanghai’s Commitment to diabetes and chronic disease self-management: program development, program expansion, and policy. Transl Behav Med. 2020;10(1):13-24.
18
Martínez N, Connelly CD, Pérez A, Calero P. Self-care: a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Sci. 2021;8(4):418-425.
19
Romeder JM. The self- help way: mutual aid and health. Ottawa: Canadian Council on Social Development; 1999.
20
Nelson EC, Meyer G, Bohmer R. Self-care: the new principal care. J Ambul Care Manage. 2014;37(3):219-225.
21
Wilkinson A, Whitehead L. Evolution of the concept of self-care and implications for nurses: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(8):1143-1147.
22
Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288(19):2469-2475.
23
Mulley AG, Trimble C, Elwyn G. Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients’ preferences matter. BMJ. 2012;345:e6572.
24
Ostrom E. Crossing the great divide: coproduction synergy and development. World Dev. 1996;24:1073e87.
25
Denyes MJ, Orem DE, Bekel G, SozWiss. Self-care: a foundational science. Nurs Sci Q. 2001;14(1):48-54.
26
Grabovac I, Smith L, Stefanac S, Haider S, Cao C, Waldhoer T, et al. Health care providers’ advice on lifestyle modification in the US population: results from the NHANES 2011-2016. Am J Med. 2019;132(4):489-497.
27
Sheng Z, Cao JY, Pang YC, Xu HC, Chen JW, Yuan JH, et al. Effects of lifestyle modification and anti-diabetic medicine on prediabetes progress: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:455.
28
Abdurrachim R, Annisa RD. Fiber intake and physical excercise contributed to blood glucose level in outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Indon J of Nutri and Diet. 2018;5:66-76.
29
Ha NT, Phuong NT, Ha LTT. How dietary intake of type 2 diabetes mellitus outpatients affects their fasting blood glucose levels? AIMS Public Health. 2019;6(4):424-436.
30
Gao J, Wang J, Zheng P, Haardörfer R, Kegler MC, Zhu Y, et al. Effects of self-care, self-efficacy, social support on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:66.
31
Salimi M, Khodadadi M, Naeimi S. A systematic review study on self-care in diabetic patients: the most important factors affecting the self-care of these patients. International Research in Medical and Health Sciences. 2019;2(6):5-11.
32
Al-Qahtani AM. Frequency and factors associated with inadequate self-care behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Najran, Saudi Arabia. Based on diabetes self-management questionnaire. Saudi Med J. 2020;41(9):955-964.
33
American Diabetes Association. 2. classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(supplement_1):s15-s33.
34
Haider R, Sudini L, Chow CK, Cheung NW. Mobile phone text messaging in improving glycaemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;150:27-37.
35
Bukhsh A, Khan TM, Nawaz MS, Ahmed HS, Chan KG, Lee LH, et al. Association of diabetes-related self-care activities with glycemic control of patients with type 2 diabetes in Pakistan. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:2377-2385.
36
Tharek Z, Ramli AS, Whitford DL, Ismail Z, Mohd Zulkifli M, Ahmad Sharoni SK, et al. Relationship between self-efficacy, self-care behaviour and glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Malaysian primary care setting. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):39.
37
Fawcett J. Criteria for evaluation of theory. Nurs Sci Q. 2005;18(2):131-135.
38
McEwen M, Wills EM. Theoretical basis for nursing. 5th ed., Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2019.
39
Alligood M. Nursing theorists and their work. 9th ed., Louis (MO): Elsevier, 2018.
40
Folse VN. Self-care, nursing theory, and evidence-based practice, by S. G. Taylor and K. Renpenning. (New York: Springer, 2011). Nursing Science Quarterly. 2013;26(3):290-291.
41
Orem DE. Nursing: concepts of practice [Internet]. 1st ed., New York (NY): McGraw-Hill, 1971. Available from: https://books.google.com.cy/books/about/Nursing_Concepts_of_Practice.html?id=xxZtAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y
42
Khatiban M, Shirani F, Oshvandi K, Soltanian AR, Ebrahimian R. Orem’s self-care model with trauma patients: a quasi-experimental study. Nurs Sci Q. 2018;31(3):272-278.
43
Zaccangini M, Pechacek JM. The doctor of nursing practice essentials. 4th ed., Burlington (MA): Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2021.
44
Orem DE. Nursing: concepts of practice. 5th ed., St. Louis (MO): Mosby, 1995.
45
Orem DE, Taylor SG, Renpenning KM. Nursing: concepts of practice [Internet]. 6th ed., St. Louis (MO): Mosby, 2001. Available from: https://books.google.com.cy/books/about/Nursing.html?id=eHuxq5vEblcC&redir_esc=y
46
Smith MC, Parker ME. Nursing theories and nursing practice. 4th ed., Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company, 2015.
47
Sist L, Savadori S, Grandi A, Martoni M, Baiocchi E, Lombardo C, et al. Self-care for nurses and midwives: findings from a scoping review. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(12):2473.
48
Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):546-553.
49
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
50
Stetler CB, Morsi D, Rucki S, Broughton S, Corrigan B, Fitzgerald J, et al. Utilization-focused integrative reviews in a nursing service. Appl Nurs Res. 1998;11(4):195-206.
51
Kumar CP. Application of Orem’s self-care deficit theory and standardized nursing languages in a case study of a woman with diabetes. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2007;18(3):103-110.
52
Landim CA, Zanetti ML, Santos MA, Andrade TA, Teixeira CR. Self-care competence in the case of Brazilian patients with diabetes mellitus in a multiprofessional educational programme. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(23-24):3394-3403.
53
Mahmoudirad G, Hoseini MS, Madarshahian F. The effect of teach-back education on foot self-care among patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Mod Care J. 2015;12(1):1-7.
54
Baraz S, Zarea K, Shahbazian HB. Impact of the self-care education program on quality of life in patients with type II diabetes. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2017;11(suppl 2):s1065-s1068.
55
Borji M, Otaghi M, Kazembeigi S. The impact of Orem’s self-care model on the quality of life in patients with type II diabetes. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2017;10(1):213-220.
56
Surucu HA, Kizilci, S, Ergor G. The impacts of diabetes education on self-care agency, self-care activities and HbA1c levels of patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled study. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2017;10(1):479-489.
57
Abd El-Aal BG, El-Nagar SA. Effect of self-care educational intervention based on Orem’s self care theory on self-care management and fasting blood glucose among patients with type 2 diabetes. International Journal of Novel Research in Healthcare and Nursing. 2018;5(3):376-394.
58
Hemmati Maslakpak M, Shahbaz A, Parizad N, Ghafourifard M. Preventing and managing diabetic foot ulcers: application of Orem’s self-care model. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2018;38:165-172.
59
Xiaojuan J. Effect of “one-to-one” health education combined with Orem’s self-care theory on self-management ability and quality of life of patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. World Chinese Journal of Digestology. 2018;26(4):282-288.
60
Compeán-Ortiz LG, Trujillo-Olivera LE, Valles-Medina AM, Reséndiz-González E, García-Solano B, Pérez BDA. Obesity, physical activity and prediabetes in adult children of people with diabetes. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018;25:e2981.
61
Unuoha P, Vincent R, Boochoon D, Duke V, Ramsingh S, Latchman-Ragoonanan B, et al. Knowledge and practice of self-care management of persons with type II diabetes at a health centre in east Trinidad. International Journal of Development Research. 2017;7(9):15530-15539.
62
Leininger MM, McFarland MR. Culture care diversity and universality: a worldwide nursing theory [Internet]. 2nd ed., Sudbury (MA): Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2006. Available from: https://research.ebsco.com/c/64bcwx/viewer/pdf/kil6ymdc2z?route=details
63
Marques FRDM, Charlo PB, Pires GAR, Radovanovic CAT, Carreira L, Salci MA. Nursing diagnoses in elderly people with diabetes mellitus according to Orem’s self-care theory. Rev Bras Enferm. 2022;75(suppl 4):e20201171.
64
Garshasbi M. Iran retains world ranking for scientific publications [Internet]. 2023 Apr 28. Available from: https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/484166/Iran-retains-world-ranking-for-scientific-publications
65
Salehi P. Iran’s top scientific rank among islamic countries [Internet]. 2022 Dec 4. Available from: https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/479351/Iran-s-top-scientific-rank-among-Islamic-countries
66
Didarloo A, Shojaeizadeh D, Ardebili HE, Niknami S, Hajizadeh E, Alizadeh M. Assessment of factors affecting self-care behavior among women with type 2 diabetes in Khoy city diabetes clinic using the extended theory of reasoned action. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Health Research. 2011;9(2):79-92.
67
Savli H, Sevinc A. The evaluation of the Turkish version of the well-being questionnaire (WBQ-22) in patients with type 2 diabetes: the effects of diabetic complications. J Endocrinol Invest. 2005;28(8):683-691.
68
Afrasiabifar A, Mehri Z, Javad Sadat S, Ghaffarian Shirazi HR. The effect of Orem’s self-care model on fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: a single blind randomized clinical trial study. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016;18(8):e31955.
69
Afrasiabifar A, Mehri Z, Ghaffarian Shirazi HR. Orem’s self-care model with multiple sclerosis patients’ balance and motor function. Nurs Sci Q. 2020;33(1):46-54.
70
Khademian Z, Kazemi Ara F, Gholamzadeh S. The effect of self care education based on Orem’s nursing theory on quality of life and self-efficacy in patients with hypertension: a quasi-experimental study. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2020;8(2):140-149.
71
Mohammadpour A, Rahmati Sharghi N, Khosravan S, Alami A, Akhond M. The effect of a supportive educational intervention developed based on the Orem’s self-care theory on the self-care ability of patients with myocardial infarction: a randomised controlled trial. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(11-12):1686-1692.
72
Ghani N, Suliman M, Fatima A. Application of Orem’s nursing theory to a stroke patient: a case study. Journal of Saidu Medical College. 2019;9(2):273-277.
73
Ali BHI. Application of Orem self care deficit theory on psychiatric patient. Ann Nurs Pract. 2018;5(1):1093.